While I was laying there, I thought about what I could blog about in the morning -- then I started thinking about the chocolate chocolate chip cookies in the freezer. Soon I was debating the merits of getting up and writing a post (and eating some of the cookies). The most interesting part of the whole debate, however, came from hearing myself say "I shouldn't get up and post right now -- I should go back to bed -- what kind of a person gets up in the middle of the night to work?" and "Holy Cow! I can't wake up in the middle of the night and eat cookies -- what's wrong with me (said in a voice of shock and horror)!!"
Neither posting in the middle of the night nor eating cookies in bed is a moral decision. Should and shouldn't aren't really part of the discussion (especially if I am trying to practice non-judgment). I am not less (or more) of a person for fighting off the urge to eat or plowing my way back to sleep (if such a thing could be done) than I would be to turn on the computer and grab the frozen box.
In the last several weeks, I have been surprised by how many clients (both eating and exercise) are driven by the seeming morality of their habit choices. Like going to 4 aerobics classes a week and not eating anything with refined sugar gets them four steps closer to Holy??! -- I could be wrong but I am pretty sure that isn't how it works.
So give it some thought. Start to notice how many choices you are making for "should" or "shouldn't" reasons -- and how many are done because that is how you are choosing to care for yourself at that particular time. --The idea that Gluttony is a Cardinal sin aside, eating isn't the final grade on the kind of people we are.
No comments:
Post a Comment